Call Us: 415.956.2828
202.777.8950

Government Contracts

Who We Are

Rogers Joseph O’Donnell is highly respected as one of the leading government contracts law firms in the country. For several years the firm has been recognized by Chambers USA as being one of the top government contracts law firms in the nation. Leading legal ranking guides such as Chambers, The Legal 500 and Who’s Who Legal have singled out many of our lawyers as among the nation’s best government contracts practitioners. Our government contracts attorneys handle all aspects of government contracting at the federal, state and local levels throughout the country.

We handle matters within the full scope of Federal, State and Local public contracts law. This includes, among other things: Federal, State and Local bid protests; claims and performance disputes; prime-sub disputes; terminations for default or convenience; regulatory compliance advice and counseling; internal investigations; mandatory disclosures; False Claims Act issues, Organizational Conflicts of Interest, Procurement Integrity and ethics issues; suspension and debarment; rights in data, intellectual property and software licensing; cost issues including Cost Accounting Standards and allowability; cyber and supply chain security; GSA Federal Supply Schedule and Multiple Award Schedule Contracts; labor and employment issues; International Aerospace Transactions; grants, cooperative agreements and other non-procurement instruments; Other Transactional Authority procurements; Offsets and FCPA Compliance and litigation; ITAR/EAR regulations; SBIR/STTR Program issues; and negotiation of Prime and Subcontracts, Teaming, JV, and Mentor-Protégé Agreements.

Among these areas, our Firm has had many numerous noteworthy successes. Highlights of selected areas are discussed in further detail below.

What We Do Best


BID PROTESTS

Rogers Joseph O’Donnell (RJO) is recognized as one of the preeminent firms in the area of bid protests. We represent clients in the full scope of federal, state, and local bid protests at all levels, including agency protests and protests to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the Court of Federal Claims (COFC). We also represent clients in appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and in other protest-related matters, such as size protests to the Small Business Administration (SBA) and size appeals to SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). Our track record is dominated by successful outcomes with a long list of multi-billion dollar protests in recent years, including two $10 Billion protest matters for Microsoft during the past two years. That clients trust us with matters of such significance attests to our status as a bid protest powerhouse. Yet, we are also nimble and frequently handle more modest protests for smaller clients. Several of our protest attorneys – Neil O’Donnell, Robert Metzger, and Lucas Hanback – are individually recognized by the leading legal ranking guides Chambers and Partners and The Legal 500, and they lead our deep bench of highly experienced bid protest attorneys. In short, when a protest matter of great importance arises, there is no better team than RJO to have in your corner.

A sample of our recent representative matters includes:

  • Our representation of Microsoft in three protests at the GAO and the COFC, including the $10 Billion “JEDI” litigation, a sustained protest against $10 Billion NSA procurement with an award of costs, and favorable corrective action in a protest challenging $1 Billion National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency task order.
  • Successful protest of $3 Billion disaster relief IDIQ on behalf of AshBritt, resulting in corrective action and four regional contract awards to AshBritt. RJO successfully defended all four awards from challenges brought by multiple protesters.
  • Successful protest of $80 Billion Medicaid Managed Care award in Texas, resulting in recission of noticed awards and preservation of several billions of dollars of revenue for client.
  • Successful protest of Space Defense Agency contract worth over $340 Million for major defense contractor, resulting in corrective action.
  • Successful protest of $120 Million BPA with the Department of Homeland Security on behalf of Meridian Knowledge Solutions with an award of costs to Meridian, and second protest against the Office of Personnel Management which obtained corrective action that added Meridian to a vehicle that it had been locked out of for 15 years.
  • Successful defense of $40 Million award for firefighting aircraft at the GAO and the COFC.
  • Successful defense of $15 Million award to Siemens at the GAO and the COFC.

Back to the top


CLAIMS, REAs, & TERMINATIONS

RJO is routinely called upon to assist clients in preparing complex requests for equitable adjustment (REAs) and claims, and we represent clients in related litigation at the Boards of Contract Appeals, the COFC, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. We work collaboratively with our clients’ internal stakeholders to develop detailed REAs and claims that will maximize their ability to recover amounts owed by the government. Our team, led by Neil O’Donnell, Mark Linderman, and Stephen Bacon, has extensive experience preparing and litigating claims involving various theories of recovery including constructive changes, defective specifications, differing site conditions, delay and disruption, acceleration, superior knowledge, and failure to cooperate. Contractors also frequently engage RJO when they are faced with the prospect of a termination for default or convenience, as well as when, in litigation, contractors need to overturn an improper default termination. If a contract is terminated for convenience, our attorneys help guide contractors through the intricate rules that govern the preparation and negotiation of termination settlement proposals (TSPs) under FAR Part 49. The RJO team also is adept at litigating termination for convenience claims.

A sample of our recent representative matters includes:

  • We helped our client recover $186 Million in a settlement of numerous claims and one of the largest federal terminations for convenience in history involving a 20-year contract to design and construct a multibillion dollar nuclear facility. Prior to the settlement, we obtained a favorable ruling from the COFC that the government improperly clawed back $21.6 Million from our client. See CB&I AREVA MOX Services, LLC v. United States, 138 Fed. Cl. 292 (2018).
  • We represented a “Big Four” defense contractor in two separate terminations for convenience involving R&D contracts for cutting-edge weapons systems. In both matters, RJO prepared large, complex REAs and guided the contractor in its development of comprehensive TSPs.
  • We successfully moved to dismiss an affirmative government claim involving a jurisdictional issue of first impression under the Contract Disputes Act. See Johnson Lasky Kindelin Architects, Inc. v. United States.
  • We are actively litigating multiple claims at the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals and obtained a favorable settlement of an appeal that converted the termination of an information technology (IT) services contract for default into a termination for convenience.

Back to the top


cybersecurity

CYBER & SUPPLY CHAIN ADVICE

RJO advises leading companies on cyber, supply chain, and national security matters. Robert Metzger is recognized as one of the nation’s preeminent experts on cyber laws and regulations affecting the public sector. His work is well known and respected by government and industry alike. Bob served on the Defense Science Board task force that produced the “Cyber Supply Chain Report” (April 2017), and he is a co-author of the MITRE “Deliver Uncompromised” Report that has influenced federal security initiatives, among them DoD’s Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC). Bob has participated in several other MITRE projects on national security, emerging technology, and other public policy subjects. When naming Bob a 2016 “Federal 100” awardee, Federal Computer Week cited Bob’s “ability to integrate policy, regulation and technology.” He is supported by a team of RJO lawyers with deep experience in this practice area, including Alexandria Tindall Webb and Deborah Rodin. Our clients include world-class technology companies, as well as smaller, innovative concerns. RJO’s capabilities in cyber and security matters are recognized by Chambers and Partners and The Legal 500 in their 2021 ratings.

A sample of our recent representative matters includes:

  • Continuing advice on present and emerging DoD cyber requirements, including CMMC, to multiple companies of varying sizes in several business sectors.
  • Advice to several leading DoD contractors on critical, time-sensitive compliance challenges that arise as companies seek to achieve and demonstrate security, including potential exposure to actions under the False Claims Act (FCA).
  • Engagement of Bob Metzger as an expert to assist in the defense of an FCA action involving allegations of cybersecurity noncompliance by a major defense contractor.
  • Assistance to many smaller and mid-sized companies on the interpretation and application of existing cyber and supply chain laws and regulations.
  • Drafting necessary policies and procedures for cyber and supply chain security and compliance.
  • Advice to many clients in varied matters that involve cloud authorization, employment, and security.
  • Consultation on availability of cyber insurance and on response to cyber incidents.

Back to the top


PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION

RJO represents public construction clients of all sizes and types including general contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, construction managers, owners, sureties, and design professionals. We handle construction contract disputes with public entities, including bid protests, claims, and terminations for convenience and default. Our public construction work involves administrative hearings and trials related to federal, state, and local entity construction projects. RJO attorneys, including Neil O’Donnell, Mark Linderman, Joseph McGowan, and Aaron Silberman, have extensive trial experience in state and federal courts and a variety of administrative and arbitration forums.

A sample of our recent representative matters includes:

  • We represent one of the country’s largest construction contractors in matters which include disputes with owners and subcontractors on projects throughout California, as well as bid protests and advice on contracts, totaling well over a billion dollars, which the client performed after Hurricane Katrina.
  • On behalf of a transit consulting concern, we pursued $5.6 Million claim related to signaling and electrical communications equipment installed for a commuter train line in California.
  • We represent a major mechanical contractor in a variety of litigation matters in northern California involving tens of millions of dollars in claims arising from public and private sector construction projects, including claims for nonpayment, delay, disruption, extra work, etc.
  • We represented an architectural metal panel contractor in a lawsuit related to the construction of a toll booth and administration building project for a California agency. After a two-week trial, the court returned a judgment for a full recovery of our client’s claim.

Back to the top


SMALL BUSINESS REGULATIONS

RJO regularly provides advice to small business government contractors on a range of issues including size and socioeconomic status eligibility, affiliation, the limitation on subcontracting rule, size recertification requirements, mentor-protégé agreements, and joint ventures. Our team, led by Lucas Hanback and Stephen Bacon, is well-equipped to litigate size protests, status protests, and NAICS appeals and routinely represents companies in cases at the SBA Area Offices and OHA. RJO attorneys assist 8(a) Program Participants, Woman-Owned Small Businesses, Veteran-Owned and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses, and Historically Underutilized Business Zone companies. Patricia Meagher and Stephen Bacon have distinct expertise in this area. We also assist large businesses when they need to understand the applicable rules that may impact a potential teaming arrangement, joint venture agreement, or acquisition that involves a small business contractor.

A sample of our recent representative matters includes:

  • We successfully defended a size protest alleging that RJO’s client was affiliated with another firm based upon the “ostensible subcontractor” rule.
  • RJO has provided advice to contractors on small business size status and affiliation issues, as well as related mandatory disclosure obligations.
  • RJO has prepared mentor-protégé joint venture agreements and amendments for numerous clients in compliance with SBA regulations.
  • RJO is actively representing a large business “mentor” in an arbitration proceeding involving a dispute with its “protégé” under a joint venture agreement.
  • RJO counseled a leading IT services firm on various issues related to its acquisition of a small business including size recertification obligations under existing contracts, transitioning of active mentor protégé agreements, and the acquired firm’s eligibility for set-aside contracts.

Back to the top


california capitol

STATE & LOCAL

RJO is a national leader in representation of state and local government contractors in matters such as contract award controversies, performance counseling, claims and disputes, contracts terminations, and public construction matters. We have assisted clients across industries: IT, telecommunications, security services, construction and design services, health care and medical devices, and many more. Robert Metzger and Aaron Silberman have led industry efforts to reform state IT acquisition practices. Bob has been a Guest Lecturer at GW Law School on state and local procurement and has spoken at national forums such as NASPO and NASCIO. Aaron has tried state and local disputes and has co-chaired the State & Local Procurement Division of the ABA’s Public Contract Law Section. Other RJO attorneys with substantial experience in this area include Dennis Callahan, Lauren Sujeeth, and Emily Wieser.

Our recent work in the state and local area includes the following:

  • Advising a leading solutions delivery enterprise on performance issues that have arisen in a high value, complex systems transformation project being undertaken by a state public entity.
  • Representation of several clients, including a major managed care organization, in state protests in Alabama, California, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas.
  • Exoneration of an IT consulting firm wrongfully accused of state small business status violations.
  • Litigation of payment and performance disputes for leading IT companies.

Back to the top


FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

RJO handles all types of issues concerning access to public records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and state public records laws. Our team, led by Lisa Himes, has decades of experience working with federal and state agencies in FOIA matters and has been very successful in obtaining FOIA records for clients in a variety of matters. We also handle reverse FOIA matters and help ensure that our clients’ records are protected from disclosure in those matters. RJO attorneys work on FOIA matters at the federal agency level and in litigation before federal district courts. At the state level, RJO attorneys work with state agencies, cities, school districts, universities, and local agencies to leverage the wide variety of state and local public records laws and regulations.

A sample of our recent representative matters includes:

  • Representation of clients in FOIA matters with countless federal agencies, including the DoD, Transportation Command, Customs and Border Protection, General Services Administration, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Department of Veterans Affairs, Food and Drug Administration, and the Department of Justice.
  • Recent successful representation of ACCO Engineered Systems, Inc. in a FOIA matter in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
  • Advice to many government contractors on FOIA matters, at federal and state levels, including accessing public records and protecting confidential information from disclosure.
  • Negotiations with several federal agencies to obtain significant FOIA records for a large government contractor as part of a pre-protest strategy.
  • Coordination of rolling state public records requests to monitor the performance of large public contracts in connection with parallel litigation.

Back to the top


GENERAL REGULATORY & COMPLIANCE

RJO understands how critical it is for government contractors to stay on top of their regulatory obligations and procurement requirements, and we closely monitor new rules and changes to existing requirements to advise clients on a diverse array of obligations related to government contracting ethics and procurement integrity, labor and employment issues, cybersecurity and supply chain requirements, intellectual property (IP), privacy, and data. Gayle Athanacio has deep expertise in helping clients navigate the impact of emerging and existing regulations on their business, including by advising on the application and scope of solicitation and contract clauses, and by reviewing, crafting, and helping clients implement policies to ensure compliance with regulatory and contractual obligations. We have advised multiple clients on compliance with the GDPR, CCPA, and other state and related privacy requirements. In addition, our team is experienced with counseling clients on complex regulatory processes and procedures.

A sample of our recent representative matters includes:

  • Advice to clients of all sizes on the application of a range of FAR and DFARS contract clauses.
  • Preparation and assistance in implementing ethics and compliance policies, government contractor codes of conduct, and employee handbooks for numerous clients in a range of industries.
  • Regular and ongoing counseling via unique “helpdesk” arrangements on various regulatory and contractual questions, on subjects such as cybersecurity, supply chain requirements, IP and data rights, and software licensing.
  • Advice to companies in interpreting and implementing COVID-19 labor and employment requirements.
  • Representation of clients in adversarial proceedings on matters concerning the Trade Agreements Act, Buy American Act, U.S. Flag Carrier regulations, and other compliance requirements.
  • Drafting mandatory and voluntary disclosures to a variety of government agencies, including disclosures required by Section 889 (the “Huawei ban”).
  • Representation of contractors in FCA litigation and suspension and debarment proceedings that arise from allegations of fraud or other misconduct in connection with regulatory or contract compliance obligations.

Back to the top


GRANTS, COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, OTAs, & OTHER TYPES OF CONTRACTS

While procurement contracts under the FAR are perhaps the first thing that clients consider to be in the realm of government contracts, RJO also represents clients in a wide array of non-procurement contractual matters. In the past year, we helped to establish the eighth Manufacturing Innovation Institute funded under a cooperative agreement with the DoD. We have done significant work for contractors under the SBA’s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we have assisted clients in negotiating emergency contracts for vaccine distribution and administration. RJO also advised in projects involving non-procurement state and federal law, including maritime, environmental, and energy law. Patricia Meagher, Aaron Silberman, Lucas Hanback, and Stephen Bacon are key resources here.

A sample of our recent representative matters includes:

  • RJO was sole counsel to assist a manufacturing innovation institute in corporate formation, winning $87 Million award, and negotiating key operating agreements with its primary partner, and has continued to advise in areas of compliance with the regulations governing cooperative agreements, IP and data rights issues, cybersecurity, and employment issues.
  • RJO represented a world class pharmaceutical and medical device distribution company about a contract worth hundreds of millions with the Department of Health and Human Services to serve as a distributor for a COVID-19 vaccine.
  • RJO has assisted several clients in connection with the SBIR program. One client seeks to win a major share of a high-value procurement of the Customs & Border Protection Unit of the Department of Homeland Security. RJO is also currently assisting a client seeking to win $300 Million SBIR Phase III award with the Army on a next generation weapons system.
  • RJO represented three contractors in successful GAO and COFC protests, and against a Federal Circuit appeal and U.S. Supreme Court petition for certiorari, concerning the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s attempt to use cooperative agreements and not procurement contracts, to obtain contract administration services. The case created the leading authority in this area. See CMS Contract Management Services et al. v. United States, 745 F.3d 1379 (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Back to the top

Attorneys in Practice

San Francisco, CA
  • Robert Dollar Building
    311 California Street, 10th Floor
    San Francisco, CA 94104-2695
  • Phone: 415.956.2828
  • Fax: 415.956.6457
Washington, DC
  • 1500 K Street, NW, Suite 800
    Washington DC 20005-1227
  • Phone: 202.777.8950
  • Fax: 202.347.8429